Drawing for CARBONWIN

USPTO serial 79243343

CARBONWIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5830675Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 13, 2019
Examiner
DEAN, JULES J.
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARBONWIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James M. Bagarazzi

James M. Bagarazzi DORITY & MANNING, P.A.P.O. Box 1449Greenville, SC 29602-1449UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Centrifugal Separators and centrifuges; sifting installations in the nature of sifting machines, sifting machines and mechanical sifting apparatus, namely, sifting machines; filtering machines and filtering apparatus for removing solids from liquidsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Sewage purification installations; apparatus, machines and installations for sewage processing, sewage purification and sewage treatmentSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
037Building, installation, maintenance and reparation in relation to sewage processing, sewage purification and sewage treatment, namely building, installation, and maintenance of Sewage treatment plants; information and consultation in building construction of sewage processing, sewage purification and sewage treatmentSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
040Sewage purification; sewage processing; sewage treatmentSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 13, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 8, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 8, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 13, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 13, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 28, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 28, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 25, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 8, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 8, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 22, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 9, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2018RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 13, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 26, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 26, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 25, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance