USPTO serial 79243383
COBRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATTS-FITZGERALD, CAITLIN C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COBRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. O'Malley
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Support belts for workers; fall protection belts other than for sports equipment, namely, support belts for workers for use in fall restraint and fall arrest | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2021 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 26, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 21, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 24, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 26, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |