Drawing for RAYTEC VISION Y

USPTO serial 79243411

RAYTEC VISION Y

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5809388Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 23, 2019
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with RAYTEC VISION Y?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

N. Alexander Nolte

N. Alexander Nolte Nolte Lackenbach Siegel111 Brook Street, Suite 101Scarsdale, NY 10583United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for sorting batch and removing non-conforming materials; machines for sorting potatoes and removing non-conforming materials; sorting machines for industry; sifting machines; gravel and dirt sorting and screening machines; optical sorting machines; waste and trash separator machines; machines for sorting goods by colour; rice grain sorting machines; tea leaves sorting machines; centrifugal separators; grain separating machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 2025NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2025C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 17, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 25, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2025ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2019FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 15, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 15, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 23, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 23, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 7, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 7, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 3, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 17, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 8, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2018RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 14, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 30, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 29, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 22, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2018LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance