Drawing for HENRI SELMER PARIS

USPTO serial 79243567

HENRI SELMER PARIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HENRI SELMER PARIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
015Musical instruments, reeds and accessories, namely, mouthpieces as structural parts of reeds, keys for musical instruments, cases for musical instruments, stands for musical instruments, carrying bags and storage bags for musical instruments, straps for musical instrumentsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 20, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 4, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 7, 2021FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 22, 2021FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 22, 2021FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 22, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 21, 2020ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 21, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 12, 2020EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 3, 2020OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 18, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 18, 2020OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 23, 2020GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2020GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2020CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 11, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 3, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 29, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 29, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 29, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 8, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 29, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 29, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 4, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 11, 2019LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN—
Feb 25, 2019LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Jan 25, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 4, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 4, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 4, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 21, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 23, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2018SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance