Drawing for CX MANAGER

USPTO serial 79243899

CX MANAGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CX MANAGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer applications for automotive controlACTIVE—
035Wholesaling and retailing in relation to smartphones, tablets and application programmesACTIVE—
037Installation of electronic devices in cars; installation of audiovisual equipmentACTIVE—
042Development of computer hardware, rental of computer hardware and installations, IT consultancy and information, IT security services in the nature of protection and recovery of computer data and repair of computer software, namely, electronic data back-up, conversion of computer data, computer programming services for electronic data security, computer analysis and diagnostic as well as implementation of computers and computer systems, data mining, creation of digital watermarks, computer services, namely, technological services relating to computers, computer network services, updating of memory banks of computer systems, data migration, monitoring of computer systems by remote accessACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 10, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2021LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Sep 12, 2020FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 21, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 3, 2020LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 3, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 10, 2020OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 25, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 25, 2020OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 21, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 21, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 8, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 23, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 10, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 9, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2018RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Nov 21, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 20, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 29, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance