Drawing for LUMIDENT

USPTO serial 79243979

LUMIDENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, JUSTIN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LUMIDENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Picture projectors; magnetic data carriers, data processing apparatus and computer; computer programs and computer software of all kind (included in class 9), software applications (Apps) for electronic and communication apparatus; software and data processing programs; software applications on the field of product identification and product tracking, codified identification and tracking label, matrixes and/or QR code; smart cards and/or chip cards on the field of software for imprinting (applying) of codified product labels and/or QR codes and/or matrixes; optical product identification devices in the form of smart cards; electronic product identification and tracking systems basically consisting of smart cards, scanner, GPS tracker and software; codified product identification and tracking label, QR codes and / or matrixes (included in class 9)ACTIVE—
011Lighting apparatus, especially electric lamps and luminaires; lighting apparatus and systems composed thereof, especially on basis of light emitting diodes (LED), also on basis of organic LEDs, LED lamps and luminaires and their parts (included in class 11); lighting lamps and lighting apparatus and systems consisting thereof, as well as their parts (included in class 11) on basis of LEDs; LED composed modules, namely, modules consisting of LEDs and organic LEDs, with light functions for lightingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 22, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2020FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 29, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 29, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2020OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 25, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 25, 2020OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2019CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 29, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 29, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 17, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 31, 2018RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 31, 2018RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 20, 2018RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 19, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 30, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance