USPTO serial 79244155
VIDEODESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIDEODESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications; telecommunications and communications services over the Internet; video and audio communication and transmission services; broadcasting of audiovisual and multimedia content via the Internet, mobile communications networks; providing access to the Internet and other communications networks; providing access to portals on the Internet, as well as on the mobile Internet; providing user access to information on the Internet; providing access to databases and information via global computer networks; providing access to a video sharing portal; providing access to an Internet discussion website; providing access to electronic publications; video and audio streaming services; broadcasting services; transmission, broadcasting and reception of audio-, video- and multimedia files; consultancy services relating to data communications; consultancy, information and advisory services in the field of telecommunications; consultancy services in the field of electronic communications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |