USPTO serial 79244336
FLAVOURTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5887594Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 22, 2019
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with FLAVOURTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Anna McCoy
B. Anna McCoy McCoy Russell LLP1410 NW Johnson St.SUITE 201Portland, OR 97209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Distillation apparatus not for scientific purposes; molecular and short path and thin film distillation and evaporation apparatus for food, beverage, pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, chemical and petrochemical processing, aroma recovery, deodorising, alcohol removal, solvent removal, extraction, reaction, the production of extracts, slurries, concentrates, powders and flavours, not for scientific purposes; evaporation equipment and systems, namely, evaporators for food, beverage, pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, chemical and petrochemical processing, aroma recovery, deodorising, alcohol removal, solvent removal, extraction, reaction, the production of extracts, slurries, concentrates, powders and flavours; structural parts and fittings for the aforementioned | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2026 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 26, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2025 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 6, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 26, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |