USPTO serial 79244419
HOPPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 1, 2019
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOPPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Brindco International Beers Pvt. Ltd.
New Delhi, IN
Other trademarks owned by Brindco International Beers Pvt. Ltd.
Brindco International Beers Pvt. Ltd.
New Delhi, IN
Other trademarks owned by Brindco International Beers Pvt. Ltd.
Brindco International Beers Pvt. Ltd.
New Delhi, IN
Other trademarks owned by Brindco International Beers Pvt. Ltd.
Walhalla Alcobev Private Limited
IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacey J. Watson
Stacey J. Watson Markery Law LLCP. O. Box 84150Gaithersburg, MD 20883UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Brindco International Beers Pvt. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Brindco International Beers Pvt. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Brindco International Beers Pvt. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Walhalla Alcobev Private Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named HOPPER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 26, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 27, 2020 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 1, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 16, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |