USPTO serial 79244463
KARAMBA3D
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BODRI, KRISTIN MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KARAMBA3D?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software; games software; training software; all aforementioned goods without and unrelated to security software, unrelated to the IT security field, and unrelated to the automotive field | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Programming of computer animations; rental of computer software and programs; conducting technical feasibility studies related to computers; rental of computer software, data processing equipment and computer peripheral devices; rental of computer software; software development; programming of computer software for evaluation and calculation of data; maintenance and updating of computer software; design and development of computer software for evaluation and calculation of data; technological engineering analysis; engineering services relating to robotics; engineering and computer-aided engineering services; computer assisted engineering design services; computer aided design of molds; development of computer software for computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing [CAD/CAM]; development of virtual reality software; animation and special-effects design for others; scientific research; all aforementioned services unrelated to security software, unrelated to IT security, and unrelated to the automotive field | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 22, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |