USPTO serial 79244550
IPMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IPMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George W. Lewis
GEORGE W LEWIS WESTERMAN HATTORI DANIELS & ADRIAN LLP8500 LEESBURG PIKE SUITE 7500TYSONS, VA 22182UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Numerical controllers and computerized numerical controllers both being electronic interface equipment for machine tools to input or output CNC (computer numerical control) data; Programmable logic controllers; Computer hardware; Computer software for factory operation analysis and improvement of productivity; Computer software for monitoring operational status and collecting operational data of machines in factories; Computer software for controlling computerized numerical controllers for use in manufacturing systems; Computer software for use in manufacturing systems, specifically for monitoring and controlling factory manufacturing processes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 7, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 3, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |