USPTO serial 79244782
REPLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5946688Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 31, 2019
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REPLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
47051 Duisburg, DE
47051 Duisburg, DE
47051 Duisburg, DE
47051 Duisburg, DE
47051 Duisburg, DE
47051 Duisburg, DE
US
US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Jansen
Mark A. Jansen Fenwick & West LLP801 California StreetSilicon Valley CenterMountain View, CA 94041Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for optimizing, analyzing and cost-management of cloud and on-premise IT infrastructure; computer programs for data processing in connection with cloud computing, datacenters, IT infrastructure; computer software to maintain and operate computer systems | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Business consultancy relating to data processing; assessment analysis relating to business management; business advisory services relating to electronic data processing; business consultancy relating to the administration of information technology; business data analysis, namely, cost benefit analysis | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Updating of software for data processing; data mining; analytical services relating to computers, namely, computer systems analysis; information technology (IT) consultancy; computer software consultancy; consultancy in the field of design and development of computer hardware; advisory services relating to computer systems analysis; consultation services relating to computer software systems; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for database management; computer programming and software design; technological consultancy services for analyzing information technology systems; server hosting services; software as a service featuring software for analyzing and allocating costs of IT infrastructure and cloud infrastructure; rental of software; IT consultancy, advisory and information services; configuration of computer networks by software; software design and development; computer software technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; technology research in the nature of comparative analysis studies of the efficiency of computer systems; technology research in the nature of comparative analysis studies of the performance of computer systems | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by replex GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by replex GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by replex GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by replex GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by replex GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by replex GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Cisco Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cisco Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named REPLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 31, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2023 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 1, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 12, 2020 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 15, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 23, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |