USPTO serial 79245232
BLOCKSHIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OESTREICHER, SALIMA PARMAR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLOCKSHIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer security software for smart phones, mobile phones, cellular phones, hand held computers, personal computers, personal digital assistants, smart TVs and IOT appliances (smart electronic appliances); computer hardware and software for providing secure remote access to computers, smart phones, mobile phones, cellular phones, hand held computers, personal computers, personal digital assistants, smart TVs, IOT appliances (smart electronic appliances) and communication networks; software for cyber protection; software for user authentication; software for encrypted communication; software for cryptographic signing; software for immunable decentralized ledger; software for detecting, quarantining and eliminating of viruses, worms, spyware, adware, malware and unauthorized data and programs on computers and electronic devices; software for intrusion detection and prevention; software for encrypted storage; software for facilitating trusted execution; software for secure payment; computer hardware; removable or embedded secure element devices, namely, tamper resistant integrated circuit platforms capable of securely hosting applications and their confidential and cryptographic data in accordance with the rules and security requirements set forth by a set of well identified trusted authorities and facilitating digital signature; encoded electronic chips for computer security | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 9, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |