USPTO serial 79245409
KESOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KESOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael N. Mercanti
MICHAEL N MERCANTI LUCAS & MERCANTI LLP30 BROAD STREET21ST FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Polyols; unprocessed polyurethane; ethyl carbamate; ethyl urethane; unprocessed polyurethane resins; unprocessed plastics for use in the manufacture of polyurethane; industrial chemicals for use in the manufacture of polyurethane; polyurethane adhesives for construction purposes; chemicals for use in the manufacture of adhesives; isocyanate; chemicals for use in the processing of plastics; glycerine for industrial purposes; unprocessed polyvinyl alcohol resins; unprocessed artificial resins and cellulose pulp; unprocessed synthetic resins for use in the manufacture of plastic moulding compounds; polyurethane adhesives for industrial purposes; thermally curable unprocessed synthetic resins; unprocessed artificial resins for use in manufacture | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2021 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 20, 2021 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 29, 2019 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2019 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 23, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2019 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |