USPTO serial 79245516
SESA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HILL, JAMES T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SESA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Belts for clothing; money belts; non-slip soles for footwear; welts for footwear; tips for footwear; inner soles; soles for footwear; studs for football boots; heels; footwear uppers; galoshes; footwear; training shoes; slippers; sandals; shoes; gymnastic shoes; beach shoes; football shoes; sports shoes; ski boots; half-boots; boots; ankle boots; wooden shoes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 1, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 28, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |