USPTO serial 79245909
KARACHI KITCHEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADORNO SANTOS, LUZ M.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KARACHI KITCHEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harold L. Novick
Harold L. Novick Novick, Kim & Lee, PLLC3251 Old Lee HighwaySuite 404Fairfax, VA 22030Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant services incorporating licensed bar facilities; restaurant services provided by hotels; making reservations and bookings for restaurants and meals; reservation and booking services for restaurants and meals; hotel restaurant services; provision of information relating to restaurants; providing information about restaurant services; carvery restaurant services; take-out restaurant services; carry-out restaurants; restaurant services; restaurants; provision of food and drink in restaurants; providing restaurant services; restaurant reservation services; reservation of restaurants; grill restaurants; washoku restaurant services; agency services for reservation of restaurants; mobile restaurant services; providing reviews of restaurants and bars; Japanese restaurant services; travel agency services for booking restaurants; Spanish restaurant services; tourist restaurants; serving food and drink for guests in restaurants; providing food and drink for guests in restaurants; serving food and drink in restaurants and bars; providing food and drink in restaurants and bars; salad bars [restaurant services]; delicatessens [restaurants]; restaurant information services; ramen restaurant services; self-service restaurant services; restaurants (self-service -); self-service restaurants; tempura restaurant services; booking of restaurant seats; providing reviews of restaurants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |