USPTO serial 79246183
LAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5772293Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 11, 2019
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Hand-held battery actuated hydraulic crimp tool, hydraulic hammers, hydraulic jacks; hydraulic servo-valves, hydraulic dispensing valves being machine parts; pneumatic tube conveyors; pneumatic components, namely, pneumatic hammers and jacks; vacuum pumps; back pressure valves as parts of machines; automobile maintenance equipment being power-operated vehicle hoists; refrigeration recovery and recycle machine, namely, refrigerator compressors | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Feng Jifang 332627196905042458
- Other trademarks owned by Feng Jifang 332627196905042458
- Other trademarks owned by Feng Jifang 332627196905042458
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named LAX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2026 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 26, 2025 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 12, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 26, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 6, 2019 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 20, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2018 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 2, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |