Drawing for CLEANPIK

USPTO serial 79246251

CLEANPIK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEANPIK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Household or kitchen utensils and containers; combs and sponges; brushes (except paint brushes); brush-making materials; articles for cleaning purposes; steelwool; unworked or semi-worked glass (except glass used in building); glassware, porcelain and earthenware not included in other classesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2021UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
May 30, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 29, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 3, 2020FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 7, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 22, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 22, 2020OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 5, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 5, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 15, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 29, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 17, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 16, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2018MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 26, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2018SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance