USPTO serial 79246647
LENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADCLIFF, BRENT
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Auckland 0624, NZ
Auckland 0624, NZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Chen
David Chen DWC Law Firm, P.S.PO Box 3041Seattle, WA 98114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary supplements for humans; health food supplements for persons with special dietary requirements; formulated foodstuffs for use in the dietary management of obesity in the nature of dietary supplement drink mixes; foodstuffs fortified with minerals and vitamins for use in the dietary management of obesity; powdered dietary food concentrates for use in a weight reduction programme for medical purposes in the nature of dietary supplement drink mixes; protein foods for dietetic purposes in the nature of dietary supplement drink mixes; formulated powdered food fortified with vitamins and minerals for the purpose of maintaining nutritional intake in the nature of dietary supplement drink mixes | ABANDONED | — |
| 029 | Processed vegan protein for human consumption in the nature of powdered drink mixes for use in preparing vegetable and plant based food beverages | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 5, 2019 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |