USPTO serial 79246757
INNERSENSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCNAMARA, SHANA MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INNERSENSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
F-31520 RAMONVILL, FR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software applications and software for portable telephones, touch-sensitive pads and apparatus with multimedia and interactive functions for the viewing and virtual reproduction of furniture and decorative objects in a real environment by means of augmented reality; downloadable software applications and software for portable telephones, touch-sensitive pads and apparatus with multimedia and interactive functions for the presentation and display of furniture and decorative objects by means of augmented reality; downloadable electronic publications; downloadable electronic images in the field of furniture | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Provision of high-speed internet access to area networks for downloadable software applications for the viewing and virtual reproduction of furniture and decorative objects in a real environment by means of augmented reality; computer-aided transmission of messages, images and videos for the viewing and virtual reproduction of furniture and decorative objects in a real environment by means of augmented reality; provision of access to online links to information, documents, catalogs and websites on the internet in the field of decoration, furnishing, layout and interior and exterior design; provision of access to an electronic platform accessed online for the transmission and dissemination by computer of information, images and videos for the viewing and virtual reproduction of furniture and decorative objects in a real environment by means of augmented reality on the internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2019 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 5, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |