USPTO serial 79247066
D DRYICE BY HCL TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with D DRYICE BY HCL TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Automation software, namely, software to integrate manufacturing operations, track problems and generate production reports, computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; computer programs for electronic design automation; electronic data processing apparatus using artificial intelligence; data feeders for use with artificial intelligence; data feeders linked with artificial intelligence; robots with artificial intelligence; operating systems (robotic); robotic electrical control apparatus; electronic apparatus for the automation of industrial robots; building automation installations; electronic digital building automation systems; web site development software, software development tools | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer hardware and software; consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware and computer software; computer programming, computer programming consultancy; maintenance of software, design, development and implementation of software; computer programming services; computer system and software design; installation and maintenance of computer software; updating of computer software; consulting services relating to the development, implementation of customized computer programmes; software as a service (SaaS) services; platform as a service (PaaS) services; computer project management services and outsource service providers in the field of information technology for remote infrastructure, network, data center and server management, web site development services, creating and maintaining websites, evaluation, estimate, research and reporting services in the field of computers and telecommunications within the context of information technology; technical research, technical analysis; advisory, consultancy and information services relating to the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 6, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 25, 2018 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 24, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2018 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |