Drawing for HTC

USPTO serial 79248011

HTC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, JUSTIN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HTC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Hand-held electric hair dryers; hair dryers; curling lamps; nail lamps; laundry dryers, electric; friction lighters for igniting gas; watering installations, automatic, namely, watering machines for agricultural purposeABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2020FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2020OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 27, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 27, 2020OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 29, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2019MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 7, 2019ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 7, 2019OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 7, 2019OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 25, 2019RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 7, 2019OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 26, 2019OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Apr 26, 2019OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Apr 25, 2019ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 6, 2019NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 16, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 15, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 31, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 31, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 25, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 10, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 9, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 31, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 31, 2018NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance