USPTO serial 79248224
SATIVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINSON, JENNIFER ELLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SATIVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Amber [perfume]; aromatics [essential oils]; lip glosses; petroleum jelly for cosmetic purposes; cotton wool for cosmetic purposes; adhesives for cosmetic purposes; scented water; lavender water; toilet water; creams for leather; massage gels, other than for medical purposes; make-up; deodorants for human beings; perfumes; greases for cosmetic purposes; perfumery; decorative transfers for cosmetic purposes; ionone [perfumery]; eyebrow pencils; cosmetic pencils; cosmetic creams; skin whitening creams; hair spray; nail polish; hair lotions; lotions for cosmetic purposes; after-shave lotions; beauty masks; oils for perfumes and scents; oils for cosmetic purposes; oils for toilet purposes; essential oils; essential oils of cedarwood; essential oils of lemon; oils for cleaning purposes; bergamot oil; jasmine oil; lavender oil; almond oil; rose oil; almond milk for cosmetic purposes; cleansing milk for toilet purposes; musk [perfumery]; soap; deodorant soap; shaving soap; antiperspirant soap; soap for foot perspiration; almond soap; mint for perfumery; cosmetic kits; emery; eau de Cologne; bases for flower perfumes; cotton sticks for cosmetic purposes; hydrogen peroxide for cosmetic purposes; lipsticks; pomades for cosmetic purposes; shaving preparations; cosmetic preparations for baths; douching preparations for personal sanitary or deodorant purposes [toiletries]; cosmetic preparations for slimming purposes; make-up removing preparations; nail care preparations; aloe vera preparations for cosmetic purposes; sunscreen preparations; make-up powder; false eyelashes; tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions; astringents for cosmetic purposes; eyebrow cosmetics; make-up preparations; sun-tanning preparations [cosmetics]; cosmetic preparations for eyelashes; cosmetic preparations for skin care; cosmetics; antiperspirants [toiletries]; talcum powder, for toilet use; terpenes [essential oils]; shampoos; dry shampoos; extracts of flowers [perfumes]; ethereal essences; badian essence; mint essence [essential oil] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 27, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2018 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |