Drawing for AIMARK

USPTO serial 79248358

AIMARK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, CYNTHIA RINALDI
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AIMARK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles Y. Park

Charles Y. Park NSIP LawP.O. Box 65745Washington, DC 20035UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software; downloadable smart phone application [software]; computer software applications, downloadable; downloadable computer software programs; software; application software; computer programs [downloadable software]; computer software; medical software; computer software for diagnosing diseases for medical purposes; software for processing images, graphics and text; computer software for image processing; computer programs and software for image processing; computer software platforms; computer software platforms, recorded or downloadable; computer software for electronic chart for medical purposes; computer software for communicating with users of hand-held computers; computer software for creating searchable databases; downloadable cloud computing software; computer software for use in medical decision support systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2023FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 20, 2023FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2023FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 20, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 5, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 16, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 4, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 12, 2020OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 27, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 27, 2020OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 11, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 11, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 10, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 13, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 4, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 3, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 22, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 4, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2018REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance