USPTO serial 79248764
PHYTALIZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PHYTALIZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
Jess M. Collen Collen IP Intellectual Property Law, P.C.80 South Highland AvenueTHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BUILDINGOssining, NY 10562Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Ethereal oils; cosmetics; dentifrices; all the foregoing comprised of hemp-based ingredients derived from mature stalks and seeds containing no more than trace amounts of CBD | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Pharmaceuticals for the treatment of chronic pain, anxiety, glaucoma, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), sleep disorders, nerve pain, chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), Tourette syndrome, seizures/epilepsy; nutritional supplements; medical preparations for the treatment of chronic pain, anxiety, glaucoma, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), sleep disorders, nerve pain, chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), Tourette syndrome, seizures/epilepsy; veterinary preparations; all the foregoing comprised of hemp-based ingredients derived from mature stalks and seeds containing no more than trace amounts of CBD | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Flour comprised of hemp-based ingredients derived from mature stalks and seeds containing no more than trace amounts of CBD | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2021 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 10, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 24, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 13, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2019 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |