USPTO serial 79248844
CHEFCLUB RESTAURANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHEN, ROBERT ANDREW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHEFCLUB RESTAURANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew A. Homyk
Matthew A. Homyk BLANK ROME LLPONE LOGAN SQUAREPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant services; snack bar services; catering services; coffee shop services; bar services; cafeteria services; canteen services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 3, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |