Drawing for I-DO

USPTO serial 79248903

I-DO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5911152Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 19, 2019
Examiner
RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I-DO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barbara A. Friedman

Barbara A. Friedman Edell, Shapiro & Finnan, LLC9801 Washingtonian Boulevard, Suite 750Gaithersburg, MD 20878UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Industrial robots, industrial robots for storing luggage; Industrial robots for use in moving, storing, placing, arranging and supporting items and things in the hospitality industry; Industrial robots for use in moving, storing, placing, arranging, and supporting items and things in various service industries; Robotic handling apparatus, namely, cargo handling machines, palletizers being machines, conveyors being machines, conveyors being lifting installations for the transport of goods, machines being end effectors for industrial robots, machines for loading and unloading of goods, transferring machines being conveyors, autonomous omnidirectional mobile machines to lift and transport objects; Mobile robotic elevating work platforms; Mobile industrial robots for industrial use; Mobile industrial robots for use in moving, storing, placing, arranging and supporting items and things in various service industries and the hospitality industrySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
012Electric mobile platform trolleys; Electric transport trolleys; Electric land vehicles; Robotic land vehicles, especially autonomous robotic land vehiclesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 19, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2020FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 10, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 9, 2020FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 19, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 19, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 3, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 14, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 14, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 14, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 19, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 19, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2019RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 29, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 17, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 16, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 11, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance