USPTO serial 79249020
YANUK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, CAMERON L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YANUK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tomoko Ishihara
Tomoko Ishihara Pearne & Gordon LLP1801 East 9th StreetSuite 1200Cleveland, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Non-Japanese style outerclothing, namely, tops, T-shirts, blousons, vests, jackets, cardigans, jeans, pants, trousers, skirts, socks, gloves, swimwear and swim caps, aprons; coats; sweaters; shirts; nightwear; underwear; caps being headwear; hats; garters; sock suspenders; braces as suspenders; neckties; neckerchiefs; bandanas; mufflers as neck scarves; ear muffs; Japanese style socks (Tabi); belts for clothing; adult shoes; children's shoes; shoes for infants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 20, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 23, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2019 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |