USPTO serial 79249301
KERLUXE SKINCARE FOR HAIRCARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PIERCE, ALEXANDRA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KERLUXE SKINCARE FOR HAIRCARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bath creams; body cream; body lotions; body wash; cologne; cosmetic creams; cosmetics; cream soaps; day cream; eye cream; eye shadow; face creams; face powder; face wash; facial cream; hair conditioner; hair cosmetics; hair cream; hair gel; hair lotions; hair oils; hair serums; hair spray; hairspray; hairstyling products; hand cream; hand lotions; hand powders; hand scrubs; milks [cosmetics]; moisturiser; nail polish; perfume; shampoo; shaving cream; skin cleansers; skin conditioners; skin cream; skin emollients; skin foundation; skin hydrators; skin lotion; skin moisturizers; skin soap; skincare cosmetics; soap | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |