Drawing for IRONHAND

USPTO serial 79249516

IRONHAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5929270Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 10, 2019
Examiner
FRIEDMAN, LESLEE ANN
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with IRONHAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rhett V. Barney

Rhett V. Barney Lee & Hayes PC601 W Riverside Ave Ste 1400Spokane, WA 99201United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Battery driven power units for robotic exoskeleton devices worn by humans for supplementing muscle strength for industrial use, in particular in connection with work in the manufacturing and engineering industry; power-boosting robotic exoskeleton gloves for industrial use, in particular in connection with work in the manufacturing and engineering industry; hand-held aids in the form of robotic exoskeleton gloves with in-built power units for stronger and more sustained grip for industrial purposes, in particular in connection with work in the manufacturing and engineering industry; work aids in the form of robotic exoskeleton gloves with built-in power units for stronger and more sustained grip for industrial purposes, in particular in connection with work in the manufacturing and engineering industry; programmable battery driven control apparatus for controlling motors for supplementing muscle strength; automatic control apparatus for robotic exoskeleton gloves with built-in power units; electronic control units for robotic exoskeleton gloves with built-in power units; regulating apparatus, electric, namely, apparatus for regulating motors for supplementing muscle strength; programmable logic controllers; robotic electrical control apparatus for controlling motors for supplementing muscle strength; sensor controllers for use in the control of motors, namely, controllers to adjust strength added and sensitivity of the pressure sensors in order to control the motors in the power units; power controller to adjust strength added as well as sensitivity of the pressure sensors in order to control the motors in power units; battery driven power units for supplementing muscle strength with the aid of robotic technology in the nature of robotic exoskeleton devices worn by humans for industrial purposes, in particular in connection with work in the manufacturing and engineering industryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 14, 2026NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2026C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 23, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 25, 2025ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2024CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 25, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2020FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 24, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2020FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 10, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 8, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 31, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 24, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 18, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 18, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 4, 2019NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 19, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 19, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 19, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 30, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 29, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 16, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 30, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 30, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 22, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 18, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 17, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance