USPTO serial 79249655
INTEGRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTEGRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. W. Wong
David A. W. Wong Barnes & Thornburg LLP11 South Meridian StreetIndianapolis, IN 46204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Surveillance cameras; surveillance video cameras; wireless security cameras and video systems; computer application software for use with surveillance cameras and videos; software for use in recording, viewing, storing, sharing and analyzing online audio and video all for use with CCTV and surveillance equipment; computer software for use as an application programming interface (API) for use with CCTV and surveillance equipment; sensors; electronic sensors for motion, humidity, temperature, and light; computer hardware for IP video surveillance; infrared cameras; video cameras for use with CCTV and surveillance equipment; video surveillance monitoring and security systems; applications for smartphones for receiving, sending and displaying control and image data using network communication protocols all for use with CCTV and surveillance equipment; video cameras with wireless transmission capacity for use with CCTV and surveillance equipment; remote monitoring and analysis equipment all for use with CCTV and surveillance equipment; remote monitoring and analysis software; computer software used to operate, manage and monitor security systems, cameras, fire alarms, alarm central units, anti-intrusion alarms, burglar alarms, personal security alarms, smoke and gas alarms, home surveillance systems, lighting controls and home automation devices; alarm systems; cameras for use with CCTV and surveillance equipment; computer hardware and computer software for the remote monitoring of sites, homes and installations; hardware for storing, retrieving, displaying, manipulating, transmitting, reproducing, encrypting and compressing images and data all for use with CCTV and surveillance equipment; software for storing, retrieving, displaying, manipulating, transmitting, reproducing, encrypting and compressing images and data; apparatus for processing, transmitting and/or receiving video and/or audio signals all for use with CCTV and surveillance equipment; surveillance apparatus; electronic intrusion detectors; computer software; software for electronic sensor monitoring of physical activity, remote automation, and security; computer hardware, communications hardware and computer software, all for use in residences and businesses for management, automation and monitoring of electronic sensors of physical activity, physical premises security systems, tracking and control systems; Wi-Fi transmitters and receivers; audio and video recording apparatus all for use with CCTV and surveillance equipment; but not including information supports recorded with personal identification data, identity cards, machine readable printed matter for security purposes, cards encoded with security features for identification purposes, electronic data carriers in the form of identity cards or other data storage devices for identification purposes, and not including apparatus for verifying (checking) identity cards, apparatus for determining identity or software or hardware relating to personal identification or identity cards | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Hosting of websites, namely, an online system management services that allow users to remotely view, monitor, program, operate and control camera systems; software as a service [SaaS] featuring computer software for processing of video data, namely, for interpreting video content and identifying segments that contain predefined key events; providing online non-downloadable software for recording, viewing, storing, sharing, and analyzing online audio, video, and environmental data; technical services, namely, monitoring of computer systems by remote access, namely, camera systems; hosting a network service that enables users to transfer control and image data using network communication protocols; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software; design and development of computer hardware and software; computer programming; installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; application service provider (ASP) services, namely, hosting of software applications that allow users to remotely view, monitor, program, operate and control camera systems and other equipment; infrastructure as a service (IAAS) featuring computer software platforms for processing of video data, namely, interpreting video content and identifying segments that contain predefined key events; information technology consultancy services; design of telecommunications and computer network systems; remote monitoring and management of computer networks and camera systems; design and development of camera systems; computer software design services; remote hosting of data, databases, websites and software applications of others; installation, configuration, and operation of computer software platforms for processing and transmitting control and image data; advisory and consultancy services relating to the aforesaid services; none of the aforesaid services relating to information supports for personal identification data, identity cards, machine readable printed matter for security purposes, cards encoded with security features for identification purposes, electronic data carriers in the form of identity cards or other data storage devices for identification purposes, and none of the aforesaid services relating to apparatus for verifying (checking) identity cards, apparatus for determining identity or hardware or software relating to personal identification or identity cards; all the aforesaid services being related to surveillance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 6, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 23, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 3, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 22, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 18, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |