Drawing for GENEVO

USPTO serial 79249669

GENEVO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 6144093Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 8, 2020
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with GENEVO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $425

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan A. Hyman

Jonathan A. Hyman Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Speed measuring and speed checking apparatus, namely, radar object detectors for use on vehicles; Radar devices, namely, devices used for detecting and warning of the presence of speed cameras using GPS and cellular communication technology; Radar devices, namely, electronic GPS-based traffic and speed camera warning device for detecting and warning of the presence of speed cameras; Radar devices, namely, devices for detecting and alerting drivers to the presence of fixed or movable radar and laser speed detectors, speed detection cameras, red light control cameras and traffic hazards; Laser measuring devices for measuring speed and distance; Radar devices, namely, radar detectors; Radar detectors and radar object detectors for use on vehicles with embedded warning receivers of electronic signals of police radar speed guns and police radar speed detectors also equipped with sound and visual warning annunciators; Apparatus for detection of radar and laser measuring devices, namely, combination radar and laser detectorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2026NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2026C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 7, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 26, 2026ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2025REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2021FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 23, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2020FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 8, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 8, 2020R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 26, 2020OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 23, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 19, 2020GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 10, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2020OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 3, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 3, 2020OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 3, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 15, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 15, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 15, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 15, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 15, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 15, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 15, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 29, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 23, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Oct 22, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 22, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 22, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 9, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 22, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 6, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 24, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 23, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 17, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 17, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 10, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance