USPTO serial 79249742
EXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MESSICK, TABITHA LEE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Milk products made in Hokkaido; meat produced in Hokkaido; eggs produced in Hokkaido; seafood, not live produced in Hokkaido; frozen vegetables made in Hokkaido; frozen fruits made in Hokkaido; processed meat products made in Hokkaido; processed seafood products made in Hokkaido; processed vegetables and fruits made in Hokkaido; pre-cooked curry stew, stew and soup mixes made in Hokkaido; side-dish made of fermented soybean [Name-mono] made in Hokkaido; preserved pulses made in Hokkaido | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Tea produced in Hokkaido; coffee produced in Hokkaido; cocoa made in Hokkaido; confectionery made in Hokkaido; bread and buns made in Hokkaido; sandwiches made in Hokkaido; steamed buns stuffed with minced meat [Chuka-manjuh] made in Hokkaido; hamburgers [sandwiches] made in Hokkaido; pizzas made in Hokkaido; hot dogs [sandwiches] made in Hokkaido; meat pies made in Hokkaido; seasonings [other than spices] made in Hokkaido; spices made in Hokkaido; unroasted coffee beans produced in Hokkaido; processed cereals made in Hokkaido; Chinese stuffed dumplings (gyoza, cooked) made in Hokkaido; Chinese steamed dumplings (shumai, cooked) made in Hokkaido; sushi made in Hokkaido; fried balls of batter mix with small pieces of octopus [Takoyaki] made in Hokkaido; boxed lunches consisting of rice, with added meat, fish or vegetables made in Hokkaido; ravioli made in Hokkaido; instant confectionery mixes made in Hokkaido; pasta sauce made in Hokkaido; rice produced in Hokkaido | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |