Drawing for WASTEMASTER

USPTO serial 79250023

WASTEMASTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VALLILLO, MELISSA C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WASTEMASTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

H David Starr

H DAVID STARR MUNCY GEISSLER OLDS & LOWE PC4000 LEGATO ROADSUITE 310FAIRFAX, VA 22203

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Food waste disposal machines; waste converters being waste disposal units for accelerating food waste decomposition and reducing food waste through conversion into compost-like residual materialACTIVE—
040Treatment of food waste; food waste destruction; food waste recycling services; processing of food waste materialsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 4, 2021FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 14, 2021FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2021FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2020OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 24, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 24, 2020OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 2, 2020ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 2, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 16, 2020EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 4, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 4, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 28, 2019RDX3NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED—
Oct 28, 2019RDX1ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2019RRDXACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED—
Oct 2, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 6, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 6, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 5, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 12, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 23, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 16, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 15, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 29, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 25, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance