USPTO serial 79250215
MOTION SOFTWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOTION SOFTWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Cloud seeding; cloud computing; computer programming; computer software design; rental of computer software; computer system analysis; computer system design; computer software consultancy; computer virus protection services; computer technology consultancy; computer security consultancy; consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; conversion of computer programs and data, other than physical conversion; creating and maintaining web sites for others; creating and designing website-based indexes of information for others [information technology services]; data security consultancy; data encryption services; duplication of computer programs; electronic data storage; electronic monitoring of personally identifying information to detect identity theft via the Internet; electronic monitoring of credit card activity to detect fraud via the Internet; graphic arts design; hosting computer sites [web sites]; information technology [IT] consultancy; providing information on computer technology and programming via a web site; installation of computer software; maintenance of computer software; monitoring of computer systems by remote access; monitoring of computer systems to detect breakdowns; monitoring of computer systems for detecting unauthorized access or data breach; off-site data backup; outsource service providers in the field of information technology; quality control; recovery of computer data; research and development of new products for others; server hosting; software as a service [SaaS]; technical research; conducting technical project studies; technical writing; technological consultancy; telecommunications technology consultancy; updating of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |