USPTO serial 79250430
BUTTERFLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5816221Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 30, 2019
- Examiner
- RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with BUTTERFLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathryn E. Smith
Kathryn E. Smith WOOD HERRON & EVANS LLP600 Vine StreetSuite 2800Cincinnati, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Bags for sports; back packs; handbags; rucksacks | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Rubber sheets for use as impact surface of table tennis rackets; table tennis paddles; table tennis paddle cases; table tennis rackets; table tennis tables; table tennis balls; table tennis nets; table tennis equipment, namely, post sets for table tennis; rebound boards for table tennis; ball pitching machines for table tennis | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2025 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 14, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2025 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 14, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2019 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |