USPTO serial 79250618
CHANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Mobile apps; downloadable software; mobile apps for video editing; mobile apps based on artificial intelligence for video editing; mobile app for social marketing on the Internet and social networks through video content; mobile application for digital marketing through video, targeting small businesses | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Marketing services; providing social marketing services on the Internet and social networks based on video content, providing digital marketing services through video, namely, video creation, video sharing, video data analysis, and video ad campaigns; providing promotion services for small businesses through video based on artificial intelligence | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Video editing services; video editing services based on artificial intelligence; video editing services providing social marketing based on video; video editing services for small businesses | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Technological services, namely, providing on-line non-downloadable software for video-editing services; providing on-line non-downloadable software and web-based applications for social marketing services based on video; providing on-line non-downloadable software and web-based applications for video editing services based on artificial intelligence | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 10, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 13, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |