Drawing for MUTT

USPTO serial 79250659

MUTT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MUTT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DIANNE M. SMITH-MISEMER

DIANNE M. SMITH-MISEMER HOVEY WILLIAMS LLP10801 MASTIN BOULEVARD, SUITE 1000OVERLAND PARK, KS 66210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Sports headgear, namely, baseball caps; motorcyclists' clothing of leather, namely, leather jackets, pants, shirts and vests; leather garments, namely, leather hats, coats, pants and suits; outerclothing, namely, coats hats and gloves; sweaters; suspenders; scarves; bandanas; jackets; coats; vests; gloves; jeans; chaps; shirts; shorts; caps being headwear; hats; headgear for wear, namely, headbands, head scarves and visors being headwear; rain hats; wristbands as clothing; coveralls; hosiery; halter tops; neckties; trousers; rain suits; rain coats; sweatshirts; sweat pants; tank-tops; t-shirts; suits; headbands; leg warmers; aprons; mittens; footwear; boots; knit hats; belts; shoes and boots; parts of footwear, namely, boot tips, sole plates, heel guardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2023IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU—
Nov 1, 2023IRFIIRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 11, 2023FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 11, 2023FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 8, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 11, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 11, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 11, 2022ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 11, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 31, 2022EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 30, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2022GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2022GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2022CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 17, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 17, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 17, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 17, 2021GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Dec 17, 2021GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Dec 17, 2021CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Nov 29, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 25, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 13, 2021FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 23, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 20, 2020RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 17, 2020OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 17, 2020OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 1, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2020OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 19, 2020GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 20, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 20, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 20, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 19, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 18, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 3, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 3, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 3, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2019DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 9, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 6, 2019DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 6, 2019ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 4, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 12, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 12, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 9, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 19, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 19, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 9, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 7, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 6, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 5, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance