USPTO serial 79251294
KEEP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOX III, LYAL L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KEEP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cathleen E. Stadecker
Cathleen E. Stadecker DOWNS RACHLIN MARTIN PLLC199 MAIN STREET, PO BOX 190BURLINGTON, VT 05401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Insurance information; financial services, namely, mortgage refinancing; financial services, namely, money lending; financial services, namely, debt settlement; financial services, namely, estate settlement services; financial services, namely, credit repair and restoration; financial services, namely, corporate workout, debt restructuring, receivership, and loan resolution for commercial loans; on-line banking services; real estate agency services; providing electronic processing of credit card transactions and electronic payments via a global computer network; electronic funds transfer; providing rebates at participating establishments of others through use of a membership card; capital investment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 26, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 16, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2020 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 27, 2019 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |