USPTO serial 79251404
DCLINIC CONNECTING PATIENTS TO THEIR CARE TEAMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DCLINIC CONNECTING PATIENTS TO THEIR CARE TEAMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Advisory services relating to computer software; consultancy in the design and development of computer software; design and development of computer software (for others); design of computer software; development of computer software; development of computer software application solutions; development of software; hosting of software as a service (saas); information technology (it) services (computer hardware, software and peripherals design and technical consultancy); installation and maintenance of computer software; installation of computer software; computer security services (design and development of secure computer hardware, software and systems); maintenance of computer software; online provision of web-based software (non-downloadable); provision of online non-downloadable software (application service provider); software as a service (saas); software creation; software engineering; updating of computer software; upgrading of computer software; writing of computer software; computer software advisory services; computer software consultancy; computer software design; computer software development; computer software engineering; computer software programming services; computer support services (computer hardware, software and peripherals advisory and information services) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |