USPTO serial 79251732
AFRODITE BY ESAPHARMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAZICH, JOAN MICHELE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AFRODITE BY ESAPHARMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Curtis Krechevsky
Curtis Krechevsky Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church StreetFloor 22Hartford, CT 06103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Creams and lotions for the face, hands and body; beauty creams; non-medicated foot creams; non-medicated skin creams; skin whitening creams; body mask creams for cosmetic purposes; cosmetic cleansing and moisturizing creams, oils, lotions and preparations for face, hands, and body; creams, oils, lotions, topical skin sprays, pencils and non-medicated lip balms for cosmetic purposes; cosmetic preparations for skin care; cosmetic body creams; body emulsions for cosmetic purposes; body lotions for cosmetic purposes; cosmetic skin lotions; cleansing milk for toilet purposes; body milks for cosmetic use; body oils for cosmetic use; body powders for cosmetic purposes; cosmetics; almond milk for cosmetic purposes; non-medicated cosmetic body scrubs for the face and body; bathing lotions for cosmetic purposes; facial massage preparations, namely, massage oils; body massage preparations for cosmetic purposes, namely, massage oils; body sprays for cosmetic purposes; cosmetic cleansing creams; cocoa butter for cosmetic purposes; cold-creams for cosmetic use; cosmetic preparations; beauty preparations, namely, cosmetics; cosmetic facial care preparations; cosmetic facial lotions; cosmetic facial moisturizers; essential oils; cosmetic oils for the skin; cosmetic preparations for body care; cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; cosmetics for use on the skin; cosmetic skin fresheners; cosmetic after-sun gels; cosmetic after-sun milk; cosmetic foams containing sunscreens, namely, cosmetic sunscreen preparations; cosmetic sun-protecting preparations; shampoos; hair creams; non-medicated hair balms; hair lotions; hair spray; hair dyes; hair moisturizers; non-medicated preparations for the care of skin, hair and scalp; antiperspirant soap; deodorant soap; deodorants for personal use, being perfumery; perfumes; bath preparations, not for medical purposes; hair styling mousse and gels; tissues impregnated with make-up removing preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |