USPTO serial 79251800
VIVAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, CYNTHIA RINALDI
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIVAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D. Wells
Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Motors for land vehicles; adhesive rubber patches for repairing inner tubes; aeroplanes; air bags being safety devices for automobiles; air cushion vehicles; aircraft; airships; amphibious airplanes; anti-theft alarms for vehicles; armored vehicles; automobile bodies; automobile tires; automobiles; baby carriages; baskets adapted for bicycles; bicycle handlebars; bicycle mudguards; bicycles; boats; bodies for vehicles; cable cars; camera drones; canoes; cars; carts; chairlifts; civilian drones; concrete mixing vehicles; dirigible balloons; driving chains for land vehicles; electric bicycles; engines for land vehicles; ferry boats; forklift trucks; garbage trucks; gearing for land vehicles; golf cars being vehicles; head-rests for vehicle seats; horns for vehicles; hydroplanes; jet engines for land vehicles; locomotives; lorries; luggage carriers for vehicles; military drones; military vehicles for transport; mine cars; mopeds; motor cars; motor coaches; motor homes; motor racing cars; motor scooters; motorcycles; motors, electric, for land vehicles; pneumatic tires; pumps for bicycle tires; pushchairs; rearview mirrors; refrigerated railway wagons; refrigerated vehicles; rims for vehicle wheels; robotic cars; rubbish trucks; safety belts for vehicle seats; seaplanes; ship hulls; ships; shock absorbing springs for vehicles; shopping trolleys; side view mirrors for vehicles; ski lifts; snowmobiles; solid tires for vehicle wheels; sports cars; sprinkling trucks; steering wheels for vehicles; strollers; sun-blinds adapted for automobiles; suspension shock absorbers for vehicles; tilt trucks; tilting-carts; tires for vehicle wheels; tow trucks; tractors; trailers for transporting bicycles; tramcars; transmissions for land vehicles; tricycles not being toys; trucks; tyres for vehicle wheels; vehicle seats; vehicle wheel rims; vehicle wheels; wheelbarrows; windscreen wipers; wreckers for transport; yachts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |