USPTO serial 79251817
AIRBOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AIRBOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Wet/dry vacuums; separating machines; fluid separation machines; separating machines; heavy media separators [machines]; extracting machines; vacuum cleaners; suction machines for scavenging purposes; dust removing installations for cleaning purposes; filters for machines; portable filtration units [machines]; filtering machines, separators and centrifuges; filters [parts of machines or engines]; industrial cleaning machines [vacuum cleaners]; dust separators; dust exhausting installations for cleaning purposes; vacuum cleaners for industrial purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Extraction columns [other than laboratory apparatus]; welding fume extractors and filters; fume extractors; smoke purifiers; flue gas cleaning apparatus; ventilating hoods for smoke; fume destructing hoods; air purifiers; air filtering installations; drying installations; desiccating apparatus; drying apparatus and installations; separators for scrubbing air; separators for scrubbing air; suction ventilators; extractor units [ventilation]; hoods incorporating extractor fans; air filters for use as dust extractors in industrial processes; air filters for use as dust arrestants in industrial processes; filters for exhaust extractors [parts of household or industrial installations]; dust filters; dust filters; filters for water purifiers; filters for air extractor hoods; filters for fume extractors; filters for cleaning air; filters for use with apparatus for ventilating; filters for air purifiers; filters for waste gas purification; filters for industrial installations; filters for industrial and household use; filters for cleaning gases [parts of household or industrial installations]; filters for gases [household or industrial installations]; air filters for industrial use; air filters for industrial installations; industrial air filter machines; exhaust arms being parts for extractor units (ventilation); electrostatic precipitators for cleaning gases | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2021 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Aug 7, 2021 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 27, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |