USPTO serial 79252043
ARTGRID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5809670Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 23, 2019
- Examiner
- JACKSON, SHA-KARA ELOUISE
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with ARTGRID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yael Rouach Cabilly
Yael Rouach Cabilly Cabilly & Co.101 West 67 Streetc/o CabillyNew York, NY 10023Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications, namely, transmission of video files by means of broadband power lines, wireless networks, and/or fiber optic network services; providing access to video content web sites and digital video catalogues on the internet; [ electronic data transmission services, namely, transferring of information, data and ] video files [ via the internet and other communication networks; electronic transmission, by means of uploading, posting or displaying, broadcasting and streaming of video content and audio visual content through the internet and other communications networks ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 16, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2019 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 7, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 2019 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 3, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |