USPTO serial 79252125
DAYMELLOW'
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AURAND, KYLE C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DAYMELLOW'?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander Lazouski
Alexander Lazouski Lazouski IP LLC14726 Bowfin Terrace, Suite 1Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; exfoliant cosmetics, namely, non-medicated exfoliating preparations for skin and hair; non-medicated soap for personal use; nail polish; body lotion; body cleanser in the nature of non-medicated cleanser for intimate personal hygiene purposes; body creams; cosmetic preparations for bath and shower; skin lotions; skin cleanser; skin creams; dentifrices; facial cleanser; hand lotions; hand creams; perfume; shampoos; cleansing cream for cosmetic purposes; mask packs for cosmetic purposes; cosmetic sun-protecting preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2022 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2022 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2022 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 23, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 20, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2020 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 30, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |