Drawing for PILIFT

USPTO serial 79252323

PILIFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5830764Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 13, 2019
Examiner
SAKAI, ADA HAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PILIFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jamie E. Sternberg

Jamie E. Sternberg Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Vacuum tube lifting machine for lifting objects; ergonomic tube lifting machine for lifting objects; vacuum tube lifting machine comprised of a vacuum pump, vacuum hose, lifting tube, electronic control unit, and suction foot, suction tool, suction cup or gripping tool for lifting objects; electric vacuum pumps; pneumatic vacuum pumpsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Aug 13, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Mar 18, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Oct 28, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 28, 2019FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 8, 2019FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 8, 2019FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 13, 2019FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 13, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 28, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
May 28, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 8, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Apr 24, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 23, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 23, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 23, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 23, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 12, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 23, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 23, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 16, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 15, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2019RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW
Mar 5, 2019DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED
Mar 4, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 2, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 1, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 1, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Feb 25, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 21, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance