USPTO serial 79252668
HONOR 10S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HONOR 10S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | USB cables; personal digital assistants [PDAs]; portable media players; laptop computers; sleeves for laptops; humanoid robots with artificial intelligence; computer software applications, downloadable; sound transmitting apparatus; headphones; virtual reality headsets; security surveillance robots; computer programs, recorded; tablet computers; selfie sticks adapted for cellular phones; loudspeakers; cabinets for loudspeakers; camcorders; digital photo frames; smart rings; smartphones; protective films adapted for smartphones; cases for smartphones; covers for smartphones; smart watches; smartglasses; set-top boxes; cameras [photography]; batteries, electric; chargers for electric batteries; mobile power source in the form of rechargeable batteries; downloadable graphics for mobile phones; wearable activity trackers; wearable video display monitors; wearable computers; notebook computers; network communication apparatus; earphones; selfie sticks [hand-held monopods]; selfie lenses; car video recorders; modems; audio interfaces; telecommunication apparatus in the form of jewellery; microphones | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2021 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 6, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |