Drawing for FERRO 13

USPTO serial 79252694

FERRO 13

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 6026078Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 7, 2020
Examiner
JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FERRO 13?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Curtis Krechevsky

Curtis Krechevsky Cantor Colburn LLP20 CHURCH STREETFLOOR 22HARTFORD, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages except beerSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 7, 2025REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 5, 2020FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 14, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 14, 2020FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 7, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 7, 2020R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 31, 2020GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 23, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 1, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 1, 2020OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 1, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 16, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 9, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 2, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 9, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 29, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 13, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 13, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 5, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 4, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 3, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance