USPTO serial 79253056
FUTUROUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHUBERT, HEATHER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FUTUROUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Sporting and cultural activities; organization of sports competitions; organization of advanced training courses and level tests; organization of award ceremonies, awards, qualifications and medals; timing of sports events; provision of sports facilities; organization and conducting of symposiums, colloquiums, conferences; organization of competitions (education and entertainment); organization of exhibitions for cultural or educational purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Analysis and evaluation of products and services with respect to possible future applications; computer system design and analysis; industrial research and analysis services; computer database design; design of software, computer firmware, computer hardware and computer systems; design and development of virtual reality software; design, development, maintenance and updating of software; engineering design; conducting of technical project studies; product development; development of software application solutions; expertise in engineering; hosting of computerized data, files, applications and information; hosting of computer databases; hosting of Web sites on the Internet; provision of technical advice in the field of scientific and industrial research; industrial testing, development and research; mechanical research in the field of sports | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 29, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |