USPTO serial 79253123
AIHUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 401
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARMON, RAYMOND E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIHUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles Y. Park
Charles Y. Park NSIP LawP.O. Box 65745Washington, DC 20035UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for use in medical decision support systems; downloadable smart phone application software for diagnosing diseases for medical purposes; computer software applications for diagnosing diseases for medical purposes, downloadable; downloadable computer software programs for use in medical decision support systems; software for diagnosing diseases for medical purposes; application software for use in medical decision support systems; computer programs in the nature of downloadable software for diagnosing diseases for medical purposes; computer software for use in medical decision support systems; medical software for diagnosing diseases; computer software for diagnosing diseases for medical purposes; software for processing images, graphics and text; computer software for image processing; computer programs and software for image processing; computer software platforms for diagnosing diseases for medical purposes; computer software platforms, recorded or downloadable, for diagnosing diseases for medical purposes; computer software for use as an electronic chart for medical purposes; computer software for communicating with users of hand-held computers; computer software for creating searchable databases in the field of medical information; downloadable cloud computing software for diagnosing diseases; computer software for use in medical decision support systems | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 2019 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 6, 2019 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 9, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |